Profiling PyTensor function#
Note
This method replaces the old ProfileMode. Do not use ProfileMode
anymore.
Besides checking for errors, another important task is to profile your code in terms of speed and/or memory usage. You can profile your functions using either of the following two options:
- Use the PyTensor flag
config.profileto enable profiling. To enable the memory profiler use the PyTensor flag:
config.profile_memoryin addition toconfig.profile.Moreover, to enable the profiling of PyTensor rewrite phases, use the PyTensor flag:
config.profile_optimizerin addition toconfig.profile.You can also use the PyTensor flags
profiling__n_apply,profiling__n_opsandprofiling__min_memory_sizeto modify the quantity of information printed.
- Use the PyTensor flag
Pass the argument
profile=Trueto the functionpytensor.functionand then callf.profile.summary()for a single function.Use this option when you want to profile not all the functions but only one or more specific function(s).
You can also combine the profile results of many functions:
The profiler will output one profile per PyTensor function and produce a profile
that is the sum of the printed profiles. Each profile contains four sections:
global info, class info, Ops info and Apply node info.
In the global section, the “Message” is the name of the PyTensor
function. pytensor.function() has an optional parameter name that
defaults to None. Change it to something else to help profile many
PyTensor functions. In that section, we also see the number of times the
function was called (1) and the total time spent in all those
calls. The time spent in Function.vm.__call__() and in thunks is useful
to understand PyTensor’s overhead.
Also, we see the time spent in the two parts of the compilation process:
rewriting (i.e. modifying the graph to make it more stable/faster) and the
linking (i.e. compile C code and make the Python callable returned by
pytensor.function()).
The class, Ops and Apply nodes sections have the same information: i.e.
information about the Apply nodes that ran. The Ops section takes the
information from the Apply section and merges it with the Apply nodes that have
exactly the same Op. If two Apply nodes in the graph have two Ops that
compare equal, they will be merged. Some Ops, like Elemwise, will not
compare equal if their parameters differ, so the class section will merge more
Apply nodes than the Ops section.
Note that the profile also shows which Ops were run with C
implementation.
Developers wishing to optimize the performance of their graph should
focus on the worst offending Ops and Apply nodes–either by optimizing
an implementation, providing a missing C implementation, or by writing
a graph rewrite that eliminates the offending Op altogether.
Here is some example output when PyTensor’s rewrites are disabled. With all
rewrites enabled, there would be only one Op remaining in the graph.
To run the example:
PYTENSOR_FLAGS=optimizer_excluding=fusion:inplace,profile=True python doc/tutorial/profiling_example.py
The output:
Function profiling
==================
Message: None
Time in 1 calls to Function.__call__: 5.698204e-05s
Time in Function.vm.__call__: 1.192093e-05s (20.921%)
Time in thunks: 6.198883e-06s (10.879%)
Total compile time: 3.642474e+00s
PyTensor rewrite time: 7.326508e-02s
PyTensor validate time: 3.712177e-04s
PyTensor Linker time (includes C, CUDA code generation/compiling): 9.584920e-01s
Class
---
<% time> <sum %> <apply time> <time per call> <type> <#call> <#apply> <Class name>
100.0% 100.0% 0.000s 2.07e-06s C 3 3 <class 'pytensor.tensor.elemwise.Elemwise'>
... (remaining 0 Classes account for 0.00%(0.00s) of the runtime)
Ops
---
<% time> <sum %> <apply time> <time per call> <type> <#call> <#apply> <Op name>
65.4% 65.4% 0.000s 2.03e-06s C 2 2 Elemwise{add,no_inplace}
34.6% 100.0% 0.000s 2.15e-06s C 1 1 Elemwise{mul,no_inplace}
... (remaining 0 Ops account for 0.00%(0.00s) of the runtime)
Apply
------
<% time> <sum %> <apply time> <time per call> <#call> <id> <Apply name>
50.0% 50.0% 0.000s 3.10e-06s 1 0 Elemwise{add,no_inplace}(x, y)
34.6% 84.6% 0.000s 2.15e-06s 1 2 Elemwise{mul,no_inplace}(TensorConstant{(1,) of 2.0}, Elemwise{add,no_inplace}.0)
15.4% 100.0% 0.000s 9.54e-07s 1 1 Elemwise{add,no_inplace}(Elemwise{add,no_inplace}.0, z)
... (remaining 0 Apply instances account for 0.00%(0.00s) of the runtime)